Sandy Mountain Festival
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943090204
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Sandy, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5036743114
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $59,253
- Expenses
- $51,488
- Assets
- $83,111
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KEVIN CAPELLE (VICE PRESIDENT)
- LISA SNIDER (President)
People named in this filing
- KELLY DREGER (TREASURER)
- KEVIN CAPELLE (VICE PRESIDENT)
- KANDY CLARK (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Specifically, it is the purpose of the Sandy Mountain Festival to: Enhance the business climate of Sandy through promotions and attractions that bring people to Sandy; Encourage local businesses to give special promotions to showcase their products during the period of time of the Sandy Mountain Festival and its related activities; Give local non-profit organizations an opportunity to raise funds through food booths in the park, which in turn benefits the total community; Give artists and crafts people an opportunity to display and sell their wares; and Promote community pride and participation.
What it reported doing in 2024
To enhance the business climate of sandy, Oregon, to encourage local businesses to showcase their products during the sandy mountain festival and related activities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.9%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.1%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.61; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 52% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $51K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.