Sandy B Muller Breast Cancer Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 262346144
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2015, Form 990-N 2008
- Location
- Miami, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3052551385
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $37,767
- Expenses
- $59,703
- Assets
- $56,226
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SANDY B MULLER (President)
- LINDA MARRACCINI (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- SANDY B MULLER (President)
- LINDA MARRACCINI (Vice President)
- RONALD E RUBIN (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The sandy b. Muller breast cancer foundation, inc. Was founded to provide one service: to assist women and men recently diagnosed with breast cancer and in treatment, with basic living expenses such as mortgage and rent payments, medical insurance premiums, transportation costs to and from doctor's appointments, child care payments, food and other life necessities. Often these patients cannot work during their extended treatment and without the possibility of income, they cannot afford to meet their life needs. Assistance will be provided to patients demonstrating financial need after they have exhausted all other government and community resources.
What it reported doing in 2015
Assistance was given to 42 individuals in the form of mortgage, rent, food, health insurance, child care and utilities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 87.5%; rating input score 87
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -58.1%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 87.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $52K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.