Sandra Beasley Independent Living Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
731433670
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Enid, OK, USA
Phone
5802378508
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$281,334
Expenses
$300,855
Assets
$238,676
Liabilities
$25,026

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Frieda Kliewer (Executive Director)
  • Brad Pasby (President Board Chair)
  • Dr Jami Benton (Vice President Vice chair)

Highest reported compensation

  • Frieda Kliewer (Executive Director): $84,282 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

SBILC is a nonprofit designed to access programs and services enabling people of all disabilities to realize the freedom to choose their personal independent living style. Activities allow accomplishments of objectives as set by the individual as well as asisting local organizat

What it reported doing in 2024

9/30/25-9/29/2026 2503OKILCL-00 Title VII Part C Grant of $225,094. 9/30/24-9/29/2025 2403OKILCL-00 Title VII Part C Grant of $225,094. 9/30/23-9/29/2024 2303OKILCL-00 Title VII Part C Grant of $225,094. Grant Income $225,121.13 deferred to 2025-2026 Grant Receivable. Held Skills Classes, Socials, Games and Movie Days as well as Craft Classes with a total of 136 attending. Total of Volunteer Hours 40 Enid Twister, Adult Special Olympics team participated in Bowling, Track & Field, Bocce and Summer Games along with participation in Cherokee Strip Parade. Number of athletes taking part was 176. Total of Volunteer Hours 269 Attendees by Class, Independent Living Skills 17, Other Classes 59, Social Activities 60 Physical Activities & Competitions 140, Volunteer Hours 269

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.6%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 77.3%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6.9%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.79; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 28%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.6% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.6% of revenue deployed · 77.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $233K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $84K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.