Sandpoint Resource Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271833740
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Sandpoint, ID, USA
- Phone
- 2082554025
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Improvement, Capacity Building N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $295,777
- Expenses
- $386,366
- Assets
- $130,599
- Liabilities
- $2,016
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- OLIVIA LUTHER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CHARITY HEGEL (VICE PRESIDE)
- OLIVIA LUTHER (PRESIDENT)
- JEREMY BROWN (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Vision: sandpoint community resource center (scrc) envisions a highly visible and sustainable presence in the bonner and boundary county communities to guide individuals and families to the right resource to receive effective and timely services to address critical needs. We will optimize community resources by facilitating a community network who work together to identify and address the unmet needs of the underserved as well as those who provide the services. We will create and promote a powerful volunteer engagement process to help the nonprofit community attract the volunteer support they need. Mission: scrc links people with needed social services in bonner and boundary counties through the organization of local and statewide service information in one central place and the coordination of a comprehensive network of service providers. Values: the organizational values governing sandpoint community resource center's development will include the following: -we respond to those who a
What it reported doing in 2024
Volunteerconnect is a platform that was designed and built by scrc to connect local volunteers and nonprofits. Sandpoint community resource center (scrc) continues to bridge the gap between those in need and those who serve and recognizes how valuable a role volunteers can play in organizations- and nonprofits' ability to meet those needs. Vip is about having one central place where volunteers can go to get connected with volunteer opportunities. The program successfully brings together volunteers and matches them to organizations that are looking for volunteers with their skill sets and interests in serving."
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 68% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 32
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 38.8%; rating input score 39
- Program expense ratio: 30.4%; rating input score 30
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -30.6%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 33.2% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 23.1% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 38.8% of revenue deployed · 30.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $117K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.