Sandhills Spartan Athletic Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 874638373
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- West End, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9195783866
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports Competitions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $171,590
- Expenses
- $100,080
- Assets
- $80,763
- Liabilities
- $1,766
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHARLES MCHARNEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- CHRIS VONDERKALL (BOARD CHARIMAN)
- STAN BRADSHAW (BOARD MEMBER)
- PAT TANNER (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of this organization is to create an environment where children in the sandhills area can develop leadership and communication skills through team sports. Guided by dedicated coaches focused on nurturing the complete athlete, we aim to foster both personal and athletic growth. Our program provides opportunities for local athletes to build fundamental skills while offering pathways to advance their competitive abilities in their chosen sport. By cultivating this supportive and empowering atmosphere, we strive to help athletes grow into well-rounded, confident individuals who can thrive in all aspects of life.
What it reported doing in 2024
Through our girls and boys basketball programs and girls volleyball program we teach fostering the establishment of core values within a team and emphasizing their broader significance, not only in sports but in life as well. Recognizing that all groups, including teams, operate with a set of core values, and understanding that when a group or team collectively agrees upon and upholds these values, their productivity and cohesion can significantly increase.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.7%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 41.7%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $100K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.