Sandhills Patriots Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 455565521
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Pinehurst, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9106907068
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Football
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $65,384
- Expenses
- $65,041
- Assets
- $12,618
- Liabilities
- $4,796
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Thomas Van Camp (President)
People named in this filing
- Thomas Van Camp (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
All funds raised support the students of The Pinecrest High School athletic and cheerleading teams. The organization buys equipment, supplies and uniforms for the Football Team and Cheerleading Squad, and it pays for related utilities and game expenses.
What it reported doing in 2024
All funds raised support the students of The Pine Crest High School athletic and cheerleading teams.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 91
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.8%; rating input score 99
- Program expense ratio: 99.3%; rating input score 99
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.5%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.38; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98.8% of revenue deployed · 99.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $65K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.