San Ramon Valley Sports Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680104800
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Danville, CA, USA
Phone
9253659048
Rating
61
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$140,370
Expenses
$112,247
Assets
$1,008,289
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN SOFRANAC (President)

People named in this filing

  • DARBY DE VENUTA-DANV ADLT SCCR (BOARD MEMBER)
  • SEAN JANIS-SRV THUNDERBIRDS (BOARD MEMBER)
  • JIM ROSSI-DANV LTTL LEAGUE (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The town of danville, san ramon valley unified school district, contra costa county r-7a, and the sports alliance have joined together to:* serve the residents of our community by providing safe, attractive, and well-maintained sports fields* ensure that opportunities are available for youth and adults to participate in organized sports activities* cooperate in providing for equitable use of the fields by all park users* use the facilities responsibly and respect the needs of our park neighbors and * work as a team in providing service to the community

What it reported doing in 2025

The sports alliance is a collaborative group made up of the youth and adult organized sports leagues that use athletic fields in danville. It is supported by the town of danville, the san ramon valley unified school district, and contra costa county (r-7a).its role is to prepare the annual master schedule of field reservations for all sports alliance-related groups, and to provide users with the following: an opportunity to pursue positive communication between the town, school district, county, sports alliance members, participants, and danville residentsinformation on use guidelines so coaches, parents, and participants can ensure adherence to thema forum to seek creative ways to address issues of common concernopportunities to support and enhance sports field development and maintenance.the town of danville, san ramon valley unified school district, and contra costa county r-7a maintain sports fields and adjacent areas and manage field renovation projects. Additionally, the town provides support by managing the master schedule for reserved use of all sports fields.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 78% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 0
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.5%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 95.2%; rating input score 95
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.98; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 16.6% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.5% of revenue deployed · 95.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 9 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $107K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.