San Joaquin Farm Bureau Federation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
940837105
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Stockton, CA, USA
Phone
2099314931
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$719,074
Expenses
$677,755
Assets
$1,956,252
Liabilities
$49,273

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

54 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LES STROJAN (PRESIDENT)
  • JAMES CHINCHIOLO (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • HERMAN DOORNENBAL (SECOND VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ANDREW GENASCI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SEC/TREASURER)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANDREW GENASCI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SEC/TREASURER): $102,750 total reported compensation
  • LES STROJAN (PRESIDENT): $1,350 total reported compensation
  • JAMES CHINCHIOLO (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT): $1,050 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A) to work for the solutions to the problems of the farm and rural communities by the use of organized action. To represent, protect, and advance the social, economic and educational interests of the farmers in san joaquin county. B) to present agricultural news and information to our membership. C) to monitor local, state, and national issues impacting agriculture and to report those issues to the farm bureau membership. D) to provide programs to the membership including those related to safety, rural health, agricultural education, leadership development, etc.

What it reported doing in 2024

The san joaquin farm bureau federation serves the interests of its members by: 1) advocating for the interests of California farmers in areas of legislation, labor management, the environment, and public relations. 2) keeping members informed of issues and events through the monthly publication, "farm bureau news".

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 81
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 94.2%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.89; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.6%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 49 of 52 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $103K · 54 people listed
  • Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.