San Gabriel Valley Kennel Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
956075115
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Claremont, CA, USA
Phone
6269158472
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Other Services - Specialty Animals

Reported finances

Revenue
$104,870
Expenses
$78,996
Assets
$57,117

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ARLENE DAVIS (President)

People named in this filing

  • ARLENE DAVIS (President)
  • ANTHONY VASQUEZ (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The specific purpose of this corporation is to further the advancement of all breeds of purebred dogs, and to conduct dog shows, obedience trials and sanctioned matches under the rules of the american kennel club. The property of this corporation is irrevocably dedicated to charitable purposes devoted to dogs, and no part of the net income or assets of this corporation shall ever inure to the benefit of any director, officer, member, or private party.

What it reported doing in 2018

First accomplishment: the san gabriel valley kennel club, in conjunction with three other local kennel clubs, conducted the spring dog show and the fall dog show including obedience trials and sanctioned matches in accordance with the american kennel club rules. Second accomplishment: the public was made aware of the importance of all breeds of purebred dogs including the proper care and feeding of their animals.third accomplishment: the events promoted the charitable purposes of the american kennel club.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.7%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.72; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -15.1% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2014 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.