San Francisco Bay Area Sports Organizing Committee

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
943052945
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Palo Alto, CA, USA
Phone
6503239400
Rating
33
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports Competitions

Reported finances

Revenue
$308,510
Expenses
$137,842
Assets
$6,497
Liabilities
$15,995

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Anne Warner Cribbs (CEO and President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Anne Warner Cribbs (CEO and President): $42,000 total reported compensation
  • Helen Mendel (Director): $38,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

1. To bid on & host major international and national sporting events. 2. Continue our outreach programs to share the ideals and values of Olympism with Bay Area youth in partnership with the Northern California Olympians & Paralympians. 3. Support the development of new Bay Area sports facilities and venues. 4. Work with LA2028 to host a spectacular Olympic & Paralympic Games in California.

What it reported doing in 2024

2024 Bay Area Senior Games. The BASG started in 2006 to promote healthy active lifestyles for adults over the age of 50. We look forward to another great year! Eligibility - All participants must be at least 50 years of age on or before December 31 2024. Except Soccer which is age 40+! There is no upper age limit. Proof of age may be required at event check-in. Age Divisions - Age divisions are in five-year age groups: 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 and up. A participants competition age will be based on his her age as of Dec. 31 2024. Age division for doubles and team competitions will be determined by age of the youngest player as of Dec. 31 2024.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 1
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 21
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2.31 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 55.3%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.46; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 58%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -6.8% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -10.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 7 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 10 filed program accomplishments · $286K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $42K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 41 of 42 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 11/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.