San Francisco Ballet
Legal name: San Francisco Ballet Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 941415298
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, US
- Phone
- 415-865-2000
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Culture, and Humanities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $70,780,810
- Expenses
- $67,149,540
- Assets
- $49,224,955
- Liabilities
- $56,644,270
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
69 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRANISLAV HENSELMANN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (AS OF 09/24))
Highest reported compensation
- TAMARA ROJO (ART DIR & PRIN CHOREO): $637,215 total reported compensation
- ARTURO JACOBUS (INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIR. (THRU 11/24)): $557,568 total reported compensation
- ROBERT H FORE III (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (THRU 12/24)): $347,318 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
San Francisco Ballet is dedicated to upholding the Company’s legacy while fostering innovation, collaboration, and world-class artistry.
What it reported doing in 2024
The association operates san francisco ballet school and a student residence. Over 800 students are enrolled in the school and 60 advanced students from across the us and around the world reside in the student residence. The ballet school curriculum is designed and taught by an eminent faculty, emphasizing a strong classical technique and a flow of movement that suggests a sense of energy, freedom, and joy reflecting the kind of dancing favored by the company. (see sch. O) students ages 2 to 18 follow a structured sequence of training designed to increase their technical skills, stamina, and discipline in accordance with their age and physical development. The program varies according to age and ability and includes classes in ballet technique, pointe work, pas de deux, batterie, conditioning, contemporary dance, and music. Drop-in ballet classes for adult dancers and a program for individuals with parkinson's reach more than 1500 individuals annually. The school also operates a summer session that brings an additional 240 students from around the world to san francisco for rigorous ballet training. The ballet school provides a limited number of tuition and housing scholarships to students based on their financial need or potential to achieve a professional career in ballet, as well as to talented students recruited from sf public schools, through the community scholarship program. Nearly 70% of the dancers in the ballet's professional company trained in the school. Students have also gone on to dance with such companies as american ballet theatre, atlanta ballet, boston ballet, english national ballet, dutch national ballet, hamburg ballet, houston ballet, miami city ballet, national ballet of canada, New York city ballet, Oregon ballet theatre, pacific northwest ballet, philadelphia ballet, pittsburgh ballet theatre, royal new zealand ballet, royal winnipeg ballet, vianna opera ballet, and Washington ballet among others. Seminars on nutrition, psychology, and related issues are provided throughout the year. The ballet school also operates summer sessions in san francisco for intermediate and advanced dancers from around the us and abroad. Additional programming includes pre-ballet classes for children ages 2-7, adult open ballet classes, repertory workshops, and classes for individuals with parkinson's.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $16.45 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.1%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.73; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.15; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.2%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 7 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 79% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 50 of 50 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $55.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $637K · 69 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.1M reported
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 17 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.