San Elijo Middle School Band Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201360655
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
San Marcos, CA, USA
Phone
7602902800
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$98,655
Expenses
$84,990
Assets
$22,084

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RACHEL JOBIN (Co-President)
  • LAUREN KING (Co-President)

People named in this filing

  • RACHEL JOBIN (Co-President)
  • LAUREN KING (Co-President)
  • ALIMA TOGUZBAYEVA (Co-Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Enhancing interest in music and the arts

What it reported doing in 2024

Provides music opportunities for students of San Elijo Middle School to play in Jazz festivals and community events. This ensemble broadens the scope of musical exposure beyond our concert program to include additional cultures and genres of music, delving into the history of various Jazz and popular styles. Students get the opportunity to expand and explore improvised soloing which is an aspect of composition. This ensemble offers the greatest number of live performances at a variety of venues. Unlike our other ensembles this program is smaller giving the students more opportunities to showcase their individual skills as musicians. The Booster Club funds registration fees, transportation, coaching and supplies.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0.5%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.9%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.26; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -10.9% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0.5% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.