San Diego Transportation Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
273020200
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
Phone
6198887867
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Business and Industry

Reported finances

Revenue
$22,748
Expenses
$22,428
Assets
$10,123
Liabilities
$2,535

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jose Antonio Hueso (President)

People named in this filing

  • Jose Antonio Hueso (President)
  • Cyrous Nahavandian (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Enhance the ability of its members to effectively and profitability serve the transportation needs of the public; provide timely information and education opportunities to its members; represent and advocate its members' common business interest before legislative and regulatory bodies; assist its members in dealing with special issues related to the public transportation industry; improve the business conditions for and promoting the common business interests of its members; engage in such other activities as are incidental, compatible, complimentary and/or consistent with such purpose and the mission of the association as may from time to time, authorized or approved by the board of directors of the association.

What it reported doing in 2019

Represented and advocated its members common business interests before legislative and regulatory bodies; assisted its members in dealing with special issues related to the public transportation industry.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.4%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.45; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -13.8% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -23.6% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2011 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.