San Diego Public Library Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
330959608
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
Phone
6192386619
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Graduate, Professional Schools (Separate Entities)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,833,665
Expenses
$2,963,791
Assets
$10,779,427
Liabilities
$3,458,476

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PATRICK STEWART (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • PATRICK STEWART (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $238,993 total reported compensation
  • NATALIE GANZ (CHIEF STRATEGY & ENGAGEMENT OFFICER): $175,807 total reported compensation
  • JEFF ROWLAND (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $159,640 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The library foundation strengthens communities by supporting excellence in the san diego public library system through philanthropy, advocacy and outreach.

What it reported doing in 2024

The san diego public library offers 12 idea labs across the 37-branch system, the labs are built to be makerspaces for patrons to innovate, discover, experience and achieve and overall inspire an interest in science, technology, design, and 21st century skills. In each of these idea labs, patrons of varying ages can work together, alone, or with library staff on creative projects. The goal of a makerspace is to allow patrons to learn through direct experimentation and from each other. This is directly in line with the san diego public library's mission: to inspire lifelong learning through connections to knowledge and each other. Idea labs do not require users to have a library card and the type of equipment varies across the san diego public library. The legler benbough teen idea lab, located inside the valencia park/malcolm x branch library, offers advanced technology and training programs for teens ages 12 to 18, and prides it's self as being a space designed to provide youth with the opportunity to build job skills in a range of areas, by including a recording studio as well as 3d printers, a die cut machine, and imac computers.. The idea lab is at the san ysidro library location and is focused on digital textile arts and features a, die cut machine, sewing/embroidery machines, serger, button maker and a heat press. The pacific highlands ranch library idea lab focuses on prop and set design; a theme inspired by community conversations held by the library. Our makerspace features include a glowforge laser cutter, 24" desktop cutting machine, a 3d scanner and a dye sublimation machine. At the central library, the idea lab also contains equipment that can digitize photos, slides, negatives, and documents; 8mm and super 8 film; and various video formats. In fiscal year 2024, the idea lab hosted nearly 6,000 people in programs related to the idea lab equipment which yielded 1,285 ideas to life, including more than 200 sewing projects, more than 1,700 3d prints made, and 532 laser engravings and cuts. Across the san diego public library system, idea lab staff see patrons using these spaces in a range of ways including fashion design, diy brides and grooms, trace students. Scout troops, e3 scholars, new school of architecture student projects, and patrons looking to learn something new. One notable outcome from the idea lab at the central library is the launch of the clean shave, a business that founded by navy veterans at the central library and went to market in 2025. The co-founders came into the idea lab with drawings and over the course of a year, completed a prototype in the lab. The access to makerspaces with 3d printers and laser cutters made the start of this business possible for these veterans. Another is the sewing program that has taught patrons to sew and have donated dozens of pillowcases to ryan's case for smiles.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 63% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 91
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.1%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 62.1%; rating input score 62
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.61 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.6%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.64; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.32; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 23.3%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -26.9% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -12.3% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.3% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.1% of revenue deployed · 62.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $239K · 15 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 20/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.