San Diego Natl Assoc of Hispanic Nurses
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300285918
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6192615769
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nursing Services (General)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $32,735
- Expenses
- $21,414
- Assets
- $92,209
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- VIOLET RUBIO (President)
- DULCE PLUMA (President Elect)
People named in this filing
- VIOLET RUBIO (President)
- DULCE NAVARRO (Secretary)
- MOLLIE NUNN (Recording Sec)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The San Diego National Association of Hispanic Nurses ("SDNAHN") serves the general public and promotes Hispanic nurses to improve the health of the San Diego Hispanic community. It is the goal of SDNAHN to increase the number of Hispanic nurses in San Diego and to foster positive attitudes towards Hispanic nurse peers, colleagues and patients. SDNAHN values, provides and promotes culturally competent models in health care, professional education and research. SDNAHN provides an important voice for Hispanic nurses and the Hispanic community. SDNAHN members represent their profession and their communities through direct involvement with local health care agencies.Programs are provided free of charge to the participants. Membership is open to the general public without regard to race, religion, gener, age, ethnicity, creed, national origin, color or disability. It's members are active in local health care issues and are committed to increasing educational and professional opportunities f
What it reported doing in 2025
Educational Scholarships based on the exempt purpose of the organization were distributed to 6 qualified recipients
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 26
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 22%; rating input score 22
- Program expense ratio: 33.6%; rating input score 34
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34.6%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.31; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 22% of revenue deployed · 33.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.