San Diego Hunger Coalition

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300507718
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
Phone
6195017917
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Food Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,607,873
Expenses
$1,615,521
Assets
$846,792
Liabilities
$542,689

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALONDRA GONZALEZ (PRESIDENT AND CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ALONDRA GONZALEZ (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $123,550 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

San diego hunger coalition works collaboratively with community partners to create equitable access to food assistance through research, education, and advocacy.

What it reported doing in 2024

Hunger free san diego advisory board & research: program continued to lead a multi-year, cross-sector initiative to end hunger in san diego county using a community-driven, data-informed, collaborative approach.guided by an advisory board of more than 30 leaders representing all aspects of hunger relief in san diego county, hunger free san diego is a cross-sector, collaborative initiative launched in 2016 to apply a data-informed and community-driven approach to ending hunger in our region. Advisory board member organizations (and other hunger relief partners) provide comprehensive data reports to the hunger coalition on the amount of food assistance they provide each month. The hunger coalition aggregates this data provides analysis and additional research on nutrition insecurity and produces maps and data tables with the following estimates down to zip code level each month: number of nutrition insecure individuals; percentage of the population of each zip code that is nutrition insecure; number of food assistance meals provided; the calfresh (snap) participation rate; the number of potential calfresh (snap) enrollees in each zip code; and the meal gap, which is the number of missing meals needed for all residents of san diego county to have access to three healthy meals per day. In 2024, the advisory board met twice to: review its collective data, methodology, and reach; lead narrative change to solidify the sectors focus on equitable access to food assistance; develop data dashboards to summarize its monthly data products by electoral districts; contribute to the hunger coalitions march & november 2024 issue briefs on the state of nutrition insecurity in san diego county; and to help plan the annual state of hunger program which features a panel of hfsd advisory board members each year.the advisory board also contributed to the hunger coalitions quarterly data releases in 2024 which analyzed and mapped nutrition insecurity, food assistance, and the meal gap in their respective months by zip code. Quarterly maps were posted on the hunger coalition websites research page along with the data releases. 2024 data dashboards now developed and interactive through tableau are posted on the hunger coalitions website quarterly. The dashboards can be viewed by board of supervisor district, congressional district, state assembly district, san diego city council district, and state senate district. In addition to the data created for the entire hunger relief sector, hunger free san diego also includes responding to presentation & data requests from community partners in which the hunger coalition shares the basics of our methodology & produces customized data tables or reports to fit the needs of the request. There is an ongoing quarterly data request in which the hunger coalition provides data and maps on nutrition insecurity, food assistance, and the meal gap for the county population that is 60+ for advisory board member meals on wheels such that they can analyze the conditions of the population that they serve specifically. Hunger free navigator: program efforts yielded a significant impact in addressing nutrition insecurity in san diego county in 2024. By integrating food assistance with the development and institutionalization of the hunger free navigator (hfn) program, the team conducted 12 hfn trainings, resulting in an increase of 245 navigators from 79 different organizations throughout san diego county.the hfn program maintained and updated multiple sources of food assistance resources and information, including bilingual resources webpages and hfsd food assistance resource flyers that are easily accessible, shareable, and a trusted resource for a total of 13 different languages. In addition to monthly countywide navigator trainings, the hfn team showcased navigator work by networking with new partners and strengthening existing relationships. Sdhc used this opportunity to train local sectors including healthcare networks, l

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 80% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 92.2%; rating input score 92
  • Program expense ratio: 91.7%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: $41.35 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.5%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.52; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.64; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.6%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 92.2% of revenue deployed · 91.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $124K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.