San Diego Humane Society

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
951661688
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
San Diego, CA, US
Phone
619-299-7012
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$67,557,221
Expenses
$73,401,220
Assets
$129,764,778
Liabilities
$31,517,063

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

33 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GARY L WEITZMAN DVM MPH CAWA (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • GARY L WEITZMAN DVM MPH CAWA (PRESIDENT & CEO): $501,213 total reported compensation
  • BRIAN DAUGHERTY (SVP, CHIEF PHILANTHROPY OFFICER): $306,629 total reported compensation
  • MICHAEL LOWRY (SVP, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $262,952 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide care, comfort, and compassion to animals in need, and to create a more humane community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Adoptions and animal care includes admissions, adoptions, veterinary medicine, kitten nursery, behavior and training, behavior center, foster care, spay/neuter.25,907 companion animals going home: total7,542 dogs adopted,9,491 cats adopted,1,537 small animals and farm animals adopted,5,550 lost animals returned to their owners,1,787 animals transferred to other shelters.28,759 companion animals admitted: total7,289 relinquished by owners,384 animals transferred in from other shelters,1,772 animals rescued for their protection,190 born in shelter or foster care,19,124 stray animals admitted.kitten program:8,324 total kittens cared for,54,338 kittens in nursery or foster care (younger than 8 weeks),2,886 kittens in shelter or foster care (older than 8 weeks).community cat program:5,079 community cats brought in for treatment,4,574 community cats returned to their outdoor homes, veterinary care/shelter medicine:15,390 spay/neuter surgeries for shelter animals,3,264 spay/neuter surgeries for owned pets,4,168 spay/neuter surgeries for community cats,22,822 total spay/neuter surgeries.106 dental procedures,1,068 diagnostics (blood work, biopsies, other diagnostics),123 orthopedic surgeries,357 other surgeries (i.e. Mass removal, exploratory, eye/ear abscess drainage).1,654 total services and proceduresbehavior and training:536 shelter animals enrolled in behavior center,648 shelter animals engaged in behavioral rehabilitation,1,184 total animals receiving behavior modification.359 pre-and post-adoption consultations,283 public training classes,1,113 people instructed through training classes.other outcomes:2,578 animals euthanized.of euthanized animals, none were healthy or treatable or rehabilitatable. All animals euthanized were unhealthy or untreatable due to serious medical or behavioral issues. The determination of healthy or untreatable is in accordance with the sdawc asilomar accords, and in such cases, euthanasia is deemed necessary to end unnecessary suffering, or for obvious public health or safety reasons.owner requested euthanasia: 3,506. Died or lost in shelter care: 309 placement rate for healthy animals-100% placement rate for treatable/rehabilitatable animals - 100% live release rate -91% report on getting to zero: "getting to zero" is the san diego animal welfare coalition's commitment to reaching and maintaining zero euthanasia of heal thy or treatable animals in our community. Previously, treatable animals were at risk of euthanasia in shelters due to sheer numbers and limited resources. By transferring treatable animals from full, overcrowded shelters to others who may have available space or resources, we can strategically move animals through the shelter system and get them into homes. This is truly a milestone for san diego and we remain committed to ensuring that heal thy and treatable animals are never again at risk of euthanasia in san diego county.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.7%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 85.6%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.77 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8.7%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.77; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.9%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 9 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 93.7% of revenue deployed · 85.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 25 of 25 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $62.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $501K · 33 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.1M reported
  • Consistency: 41 of 41 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.