San Diego Hospice Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
953125765
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2010
Forms available
Form 990 2010
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
Phone
6196881600
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Hospices

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$82,772,913
Expenses
$83,307,537
Assets
$20,502,216
Liabilities
$9,783,389

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

43 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide professional support, practical assistance and education to terminally ill persons, members of their families and significant others.

What it reported doing in 2010

Founded in 1977, san diego hospice and the institute for palliative medicine (sdhipm) was the first hospice program established in the san diego area. Our mission centers on relieving pain and suffering, including physical, emotional, social and spiritual pain experienced during serious illness or at the end of life. Through impeccable quality of services to patients and their loved ones, as well as providing professional education to clinicians at our world-renowned institute for palliative medicine, sdhipm seeks to change for the better the way people face death and dying.sdhipm serves people of all ages across the entire san diego county region. We care for nearly 1,200 patients a day in their homes, acute-care settings, long-term care facilities and through our inpatient care center, the only free-standing hospice hospital in California. Community events sponsored by sdhipm educate more than 78,000 people each year. Sdhipm's institute for palliative medicine (the institute) is the preeminent provider of professional education in palliative medicine and the world leader in palliative medicine research. The institute has played a major role in establishing the global groundwork for education and research in palliative medicine, as well as integrating palliative medicine into healthcare systems such as hospitals and long-term-care facilities. The institute's center for advanced learning trains more than 3,400 clinicians (physicians, nurses, social workers, pharmacists and clergy) from around the world each year in palliative care. The institute's physician fellowship program is the largest in the u.s., with both u.s. Fellows and fellows from developing countries. The institute's center for research completed 5 studies during the year and has 40 active studies funded by the national institute for health or private foundations. Sdhipm's center for grief care and education is a resource offering emotional support and education about grief, loss and change before and after a death. Our grief and bereavement services annually reach over 9,500 individuals of all ages. Our center for grief care and education educates and employs highly trained therapists that offer a variety of individualized services using various therapeutic modalities, with individuals, families, groups, and through workshops and specialized children's programs.sdhipm's comprehensive case management programs (ccmp) focus on helping people of all ages who are living with long-term illnesses. We bring them emotional and practical support that helps them maintain their independence, manage their lives, and deal with the challenges they face daily. Services provided by ccmp are made possible by state and federal funds through state waiver programs, and there are no out-of-pocket expenses for any of our clients. Ccmp includes our HIV/AIDS case management program where we coordinate daily living issues for clients that are medical, legal, financial, housing and transportation related, as well as provide education to them in managing their disease. Ccmp also includes our partners for children program, a pediatric palliative care state waiver program approved in october of 2009, which offers services to children in need. This program provides palliative case management services to medi-cal and ccs (California child service) approved children with life-threatening illnesses. The program allows these children to receive palliative services concurrent with curative treatments. Services include care coordination, family education and training, expressive therapies, respite care and support counseling for child and family.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 98
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Limited
    • Conducts field audits: Limited
    • May suspend future funding: Limited
    • Requires financial reports: Pass
    • Conducts site visits: Limited
    • Requires grant agreements: Limited
    • May require repayment: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 50%; rating input score 50; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 95.7%; rating input score 96; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.6%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.48; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 22 of 23 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $74.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $261K · 43 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2009 to 2010
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.