San Diego County Floor Covering Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
330172775
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
National City, CA, USA
Phone
6192032046
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,451
Expenses
$20,326
Assets
$89,384
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID MCCOWAN (PRESIDENT)
  • MARCY LEHNHERR (PRESIDENT)
  • TONY GARCIA (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • CARRIE GUSTAFSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • DAVID MCCOWAN (PRESIDENT)
  • KEN MCKILLIP (BOARD MEMBER)
  • MARCY LEHNHERR (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Improve and promote floor covering industry.

What it reported doing in 2019

Fundraisers are held to benefit local charities, such as ronald mcdonald house, wounded warrior, and other miscellaneous charities. $6,000 in scholarships were awarded this year to san diego county floor covering association members, children, spouses, or employees of same who are attending a California college full time, who have submitted an application, essay of goals, a recommendation letter and other requirements of the board. Board members in the scholarship committee interview the applicants and decide on the recipients.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -16.5%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.4; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 21.1% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -23% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.9% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $65K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2016 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.