San Diego 4 of the American Society of Professional Estimators
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 923128606
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6195048263
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,205
- Expenses
- $10,013
- Assets
- $88,419
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEFFREY MADRIGAL (PRESIDENT)
- PAUL CHANG (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JASON HOWELL (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CHAN JESSEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TOM D VEITCH (DIRECTOR)
- TRAVIS WILSON (DIRECTOR)
- MARCO LOZA (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
San diego 4 of the american society of professional estimators is the construction industry's leader and recognized authority in professional estimating through excellence in education, certification, and standardization. Core purposes are education, professionalism, and fellowship. Education - we educate and mentor professional estimators for the sustainability of the construction industry. Professionalism - we promote the lifelong pursuit of excellence and credibility in professional estimating. Fellowship - we develop a fellowship of professional estimators that connects and leads the construction industry.
What it reported doing in 2025
San diego 4 of the american society of professional estimators provides educational programs, scholarships for students at local colleges and universities, and holds monthly meetings with topics of interest in the construction industry.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.8%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.83; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -79.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.