San Antonio Mexican American Bar Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 161675248
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- San Antonio, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2102250811
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $88,357
- Expenses
- $42,971
- Assets
- $164,935
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ENRIQUETA KATIE CARRASCO (PRESIDENT)
- SHELLIE REYES (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JUAN CARLOS RODRIGUEZ (PAST PRESIDENT)
- CLAUDIA GALAN (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
People named in this filing
- ENRIQUETA KATIE CARRASCO (PRESIDENT)
- SHELLIE REYES (VICE PRESIDENT)
- GABRIEL ELORREAGA (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mexican american bar association provides a forum and a means for lawyers to promote the social, economic, political and educational advancement of the people of this community; to serve the mexican american community as a professional association by providing legal services, assistance and advice on matters of concern to the community, to encourage respect for the judicial system by rewarding and commending those who persist in the pursuit of fairness, justice and equality and by vigilantly guarding the rights of those who the system would oppress; and to work through legislation, advocacy and education to accomplish these goals.
What it reported doing in 2024
Sixteen students were given college scholarships of $2,500 each.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 45.3%; rating input score 45
- Program expense ratio: 93.1%; rating input score 93
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 51.4%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.84; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.3% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 45.3% of revenue deployed · 93.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $40K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.