San Antonio Medical Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
741366280
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
San Antonio, TX, USA
Phone
2106143724
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,929,784
Expenses
$1,543,679
Assets
$9,473,568
Liabilities
$284,503

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

36 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RICHARD PEREZ (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • RICHARD PEREZ (PRESIDENT): $290,640 total reported compensation
  • KAREN BLANCHETTE (DIRECTOR, BOARD AND PUB): $147,140 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

What it reported doing in 2025

The foundation promotes and provides assistance in the establishment, support, and maintenance of not-for-profit health care facilities. It also promotes and provides assistance in health care education. Organizations that meet the above criteria may submit a letter of intent to the land use committee, who recommends the organization to the board of trustees. The board of the trustees grants approval for all qualified land requests and other program service disbursements. During 2025, the estimated value of donated leases for medical organizations was $1,435,803. In an effort to promote health and wellness, a walking/jogging trail is available for use by the general public. The healthy kids project is focused on grades k-2 believing that if you teach the child early in life, you may affect not only the child, but the child's family as well. The project was produced in conjunction with klrn (public television). The program consists of: 1) interstitials between children's educational programs on klrn (think commercials on regular television), 2) downloadable lesson plans on the klrn website for use in classrooms, and 3) dvds for the classroom and home loan. Lessons include short videos, songs and chants that the students can learn quickly and easily to help them remember such things as "drink water and are available in both english and spanish. Input from local educators, dieticians and physicians was critical in developing the curriculum for this project. The project has been distributed and promoted in school districts throughout the local community. The local chapter of the united way is also using it in several initiatives with children and also parent groups. The lesson plans not only meet the Texas educational criteria but has also been modified to meet national educational standards as well. It has been placed on pbs learning media. The healthy kids project is free to everyone. The san antonio mobile mental wellness collaborative is the first of its kind in the nation. The collaborative is made up of several nonprofit organizations who make it their mission to bring the much-needed mental health services out of the agency and into the public school setting. It is an upstream collaborative focusing on prevention so that public schools do not have to concentrate fully on intervention. In order for the collaborative to ensure the partnership is successful and continue to expand and reach more children and their families, it needed an executive director. The foundation provided funds for an executive director's salary and may provide additional funds based on growth and expansion in future years.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 94% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 68% for direct work, and 32% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 84.4%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.14; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 28.4%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68% of revenue deployed · 84.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 34 of 34 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $291K · 36 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 10 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.