San Antonio Masonry Contractors Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742755498
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- San Antonio, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8306065556
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $68,256
- Expenses
- $76,655
- Assets
- $130,235
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DERRICK STONE (PRESIDENT)
- WESTON SHADROCK (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LEROY SOLIS (DIRECTOR)
- JEFF SPALDING (DIRECTOR)
- MICHAEL HUNT (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The association's primary exempt purposes are to organize proprietors and owners of masonry contracting businesses and those firms engaged in the support of those businesses in the san antonio, tx area to aquire, preserve, and disseminate valuable business information with respect to the masonry contracting industry; to improve masonry construction and to establish an apprenticeship program; to assist in training and educational programs for masonry workers; and generally to promose the interest of trade and increase the facilities of commercial transactions related to the masonry contracting industry.
What it reported doing in 2024
Monthly membership meetings and newsletters keep members informed, educated, and motivated in matters concerning masonry construction. An apprentice program trains and encourages new entrants into the field of masonry construction and to promote indiviual acheivement in the field of masonry.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 66% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -12.3%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.7; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.