San Antonio for Growth on the Eastside Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
742876270
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
San Antonio, TX, USA
Phone
2102489178
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Low-Income & Subsidized Rental Housing

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$689,096
Expenses
$720,131
Assets
$618,047
Liabilities
$67,292

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAMES NORTEY (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JAMES NORTEY (CEO): $132,240 total reported compensation
  • FERNANDO GARCIA (CFO): $81,981 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Sage promotes the economic development and cultural vitality of san antonio's eastside.

What it reported doing in 2025

Community engagement - sage hosts community and special events throughout the year, including: halloeast - halloeast is a free family-friendly community block party celebrating halloween. This event is more than just trick-or-treating -- it's an opportunity for residents to connect with neighbors and share valuable community resources. This event attracted over 530 attendees and more than 50 vendors from the community. In 2024 sage was awarded a 150,000 community economic development (ced) planning grant from the u.s. Department of health and human services, aimed at building the administrative capacity needed to develop a public market complex on san antonio's eastside. This planning project marks a significant step forward in sage's commitment to fostering economic vitality in this minority-majority area, which has long grappled with systemic poverty, high unemployment, and the lingering effects of historical disenfranchisement through redlining, racial segregation, and governmental disinvestment. Through the ced planning funds, sage will develop a comprehensive, community-informed business plan to establish a public market complex that will serve as an economic anchor for the eastside. This vibrant community space is envisioned to address the critical shortage of grocery stores, dining, and entertainment options in the area, and create a central hub where residents can support local businesses, enjoy community events, and access essential goods and services. In 2025, sage was awarded a ced implementation grant from the u.s. Department of health and human services totaling 800,000 to support the development of a revolving loan program intended to provide financial assistance to small businesses in the eastside community. This same year sage was awarded a 2,000,000 u.s. Department of transportation reconnecting communities project (rcp) planning grant to address longstanding barriers created by highways on san antonio's eastside. The project focuses on developing a vision to cap, bury, and transform sections of ih-10, ih-35, and ih-37 into green, pedestrian-friendly spaces. This effort aims to reconnect historically divided neighborhoods, enhance mobility, and spur economic development. Sage directly engages more than 7,000 community members through its website, semi-monthly newsletter, and social media engagement.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 79% for direct work, and 21% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 53.6%; rating input score 54
  • Program expense ratio: 50.1%; rating input score 50
  • Fundraising efficiency: $47.35 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 79%; rating input score 79; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.5%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 29.7%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 53.6% of revenue deployed · 50.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $361K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $132K · 17 people listed
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.