San Antonio District Dental Society
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 746051690
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- San Antonio, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2107321264
- Rating
- 38
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $179,069
- Expenses
- $232,023
- Assets
- $395,514
- Liabilities
- $239,987
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Oshmi Dutta DDS BDS (President)
- Kelsey Edmondson DDS (President-Elect)
- Sarah Tovar DDS (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Frederick Philips DDS (Imm. Past Pres.)
- Oshmi Dutta DDS BDS (President)
- Kelsey Edmondson DDS (President-Elect)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization provides professional development opportunities for approximately 900 members, publishes a bi-monthly newsletter for its members, and creates dental awareness to the residents of San Antonio, Texas.
What it reported doing in 2024
The San Antonio District Dental Society SADDS provides meeting and professional development opportunities for approximately 900 members, publishes a bi-monthly newsletter for its members, and creates dental awareness to the residents of San Antonio, Texas and 13 surrounding counties. Our Mission is Promoting Value for our Profession via Helping All Members Succeed. Our core values are our Members, To Protect legislative, To Promote via communication, and To Succeed.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 2
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 2.8%; rating input score 3
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -29.6%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.7; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.61; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 2.8% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.