San Antonio Community Resource Directory
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 834051815
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- San Antonio, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2102790586
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Science and Technology N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $279,408
- Expenses
- $266,455
- Assets
- $62,293
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- HAROLD NEELY (Executive Dir.): $45,213 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The San Antonio Community Resource Directory, SACRD.org, identifies, collects, maintains, and freely shares information about all human services and compassionate care offered by every nonprofit, congregation, government agency, and compassionate community in Greater San Antonio so that those with a need can find a place with the capacity to meet that need.
What it reported doing in 2024
Housing Services Portal (Completed): In 2024, SACRD.org successfully completed and launched the Housing Services Portal in partnership with the City of San Antonio. This portal provides a centralized, easy-to-navigate resource for residents seeking housing assistance and information. Following its successful launch, the organization secured a two-year contract extension from the City of San Antonio to continue supporting and enhancing this vital community tool.Community Convening & Training: SACRD.org continued its commitment to strengthen the local human services sector by hosting five in-person events in 2024. These convenings brought together approximately 400 social workers, community navigators, and nonprofit professionals from over 100 different agencies. The events focused on sharing best practices in community resourcing, fostering professional relationships, and promoting collaboration to better serve the community. New Program Development & Fundraising: A significant portion of 2024 was dedicated to building partnerships and securing funding for future program expansions. The organization successfully secured major grant funding and partnership commitments to develop and launch several new, specialized portals in 2025. These secured projects include comprehensive Disability and IDD Support Portal, Older Adult Services Portal, and a Substance Use Portal.Regional Expansion: SACRD.org expanded its regional impact in 2024 by launching Comalcares.org. This new resource portal, created in partnership with the McKenna Foundation, applies SACRD.org's high-standard resourcing model to support the human services ecosystem in Comal County, TX, ensuring its residents have access to the same quality of information. SACRD.org also secured commitment from a partner to develop a new resourcing portal for a seven-county region in the Texas Hill Country.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 67% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.2%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 88.3%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $17.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.6%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 41.7% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 36.1% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.2% of revenue deployed · 88.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $235K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $45K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.