San Anselmo Nursery School Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
946103972
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
San Anselmo, CA, USA
Phone
4154545308
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$170,615
Expenses
$146,406
Assets
$206,418
Liabilities
$92,999

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MINNA KIM (PRESIDENT)
  • NATALIE GUPTA (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • REBECCA NOWLEN (DIRECTOR)
  • MINNA KIM (PRESIDENT)
  • ANLOR STEINER (FUNDRAISER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide a parent participation pre-school.

What it reported doing in 2020

Program service accomplishments: provide a parent participation nursery school for pre-school age children supervised by trained personnel. Morning programs run sept-june, 5 days/week for 24 children. Need based scholarships are available.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14.2%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.45; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 68%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -63.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2014 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.