San Angelo Police Officers Coalition

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752588866
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
San Angelo, TX, USA
Phone
3256563393
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$95,892
Expenses
$84,552
Assets
$160,369
Liabilities
$84

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NOEL ANDERSON (PRESIDENT)
  • CHARLES FLORES (VICE PRESIDENT OF OFFICERS)
  • JOHN BOULIGNEY (VICE PRESIDENT OF SUPERVISORS)

People named in this filing

  • ZANE DANIEL (PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGER)
  • KELSEY HERNANDEZ (AUDITOR)
  • NOEL ANDERSON (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The general objectives of the association consist of promoting benevolent, educational, charitable, civic, patriotic, and fraternal activities among its members. The specific objectives of the association are to preserve and strengthen comradeship among its members; to improve wages, hours of work, security, economic, cultural, legislative, social, political, and recreational interest of its members, their families and others; to defend and extend democratic institutions, procedures, civil rights and liberties of its members, their families and others; to maintain true allegiance and faith in the laws of the state of Texas and the constitution of the united states of america.

What it reported doing in 2025

Promoting benevolent, educational, charitable, civic, patriotic, and fraternal activities among its members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Liabilities are high compared with assets and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 99.3%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.8%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.9; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88% of revenue deployed · 99.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $84K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.