Sammamish High School Boosters
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911300361
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Bellevue, WA, USA
- Phone
- 4256031458
- Rating
- 42
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $124,323
- Expenses
- $80,084
- Assets
- $205,947
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Sarah Keibler (President)
- Betsy Vo (Co-President)
- Laura Dooley (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Sarah Keibler (President)
- Chelsea Lientz (Treasurer)
- Betsy Vo (Co-President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Sammamish High School Boosters provides funding for athletic, extra-curricular, and academic needs of Sammamish High School for the benefit of students and educators where funding is not otherwise available from the state or local school district.
What it reported doing in 2024
Athletics - Support for equipment, uniforms, and community building activities for the following Sammamish High School athletic programs: Soccer (approx 80 students); B; Girls Volleyball (approx 40 students); Boys/Girls Basketball (approx 90 students); Lacrosse (aprox 20 students) Track and Cross Country (approx 100 students); Tennis (approx 40 students); Swim and Dive (approx 100 students), Wrestling (Aprox 30 students
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 35.6%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.57; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.8% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.