Samaritan Women Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
331084718
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2021
Forms available
Form 990 2021, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Rochester, NY, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Children's, Youth Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$43,330
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DAN UMIKER (DIRECTOR)
  • SHETARA BIGHAM (DIRECTOR)
  • GIOVANNA GUITIERREZ (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to improve the overall health outcomes of women and families impacted by the criminal justice system and substance use disorders.

What it reported doing in 2021

With our communitys support, this past fiscal year, samaritan center served over 260 unique individuals who were recovering from alcohol/substance use disorders, mental health, and seeking emotional and physical stability. Include people transitioning from the criminal justice system, those seeking/in recovery from substance use disorders, living in emergency shelters, transitional housing programs, or those who receive after-housing care and supportive services. 1. Developed 4 recovery community organizations (rcos) across western New York, central New York, and the finger lakes region. 2. Created, published, and distributed the 1st everyday women in recovery calendar 2016-2017 calendar 3. United way day of caring partering with the childrens institute 4. Hcbs co-location shared space presentation at New York association of psychiatric rehabilitation services conference. Compassion. Community partnership hope. Accessibility. These six words1 represent what we stand for - what we care deeply about - how we connect with individuals and families we work with, and how we treat each other. These words also represent the diversity and the inclusion of all people. In 2018 major contributions; samaritan center was fortunate to receive a generous gift in the form of a house. The house was donated and transfored to provide temporary housing and stability for women in need the house was renovated and fully furnished to accomodate four women. In addition, the organization acquired 381-385 saxton street, rochester, ny. This housing porject will undergo renovations in 2019 and will allow housing availability for 4-5 families. The acronym act captures our guiding principles for our organizations eliefs and philosophy pertaining quality assurance and performance improvement. Accountable by measuring ourselves against the highest standards of integrity. Compassionate by communicating internally and externally and unwavering candor, honesty, and respect. Transparent about everything we do.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 51
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 30
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 68%; rating input score 68
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -20.7% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -33.9% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -39% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.