Sam Johnson Chapter Dallas Air and Space Forces Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 756053206
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Plano, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2143947142
- Rating
- 45
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $96,693
- Expenses
- $79,890
- Assets
- $74,194
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Robert Gehbauer (Chapter President)
- Matthew Crawford (Chapter Executive Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Robert Gehbauer (Chapter President)
- Matthew Crawford (Chapter Executive Vice President)
- Fletcher Sharp (Chapter Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Educate, advocate and support Veteran Service Organizations and active military, Air National Guard and Reserve and retired members.
What it reported doing in 2025
Provide support to an unknown number of veterans through donations to Wounded Airmen and Guardians, Our Community Salutes-DFW, Veteran's Day Parade and local Civil Air Patrol, Air National Guard and Reserve organizations. One-time donations to the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation, Kerr County Texas Disaster Relief Fund, and 100th Bomb Group Foundation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 9
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 8.2%; rating input score 8
- Program expense ratio: 9.9%; rating input score 10
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.4%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 30.5% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 24.6% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 8.2% of revenue deployed · 9.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 8/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.