Salute The Kids

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813956225
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Rockwall, TX, USA
Phone
8179442504
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Family Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$22,712
Expenses
$30,686
Assets
$9,452
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Josh Houser (Director)
  • Kristi Bryant (Director)
  • Sommer Houser (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Salute the Kids recognizes and supports military connected children through camping adventures. Salute the Kids believes it is important to recognize military children for their service to our country and support them by providing a free, fun-filled camping experience that will change their lives in a positive way, help them develop coping skills, increase resiliency and self-confidence while embracing the beauty and healing components of nature.

What it reported doing in 2024

Salute the Kids mission to support and recognize military connected kids through camping adventures. Salute the Kids believes it is important to recognize military children for their service to our country and support them by providing a free, fun-filled camping experience that will change their lives in a positive way, help them develope coping skills, increase resiliency and self-confidence while embracing the beauty and healing components of nature and connecting to other military families.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -35.1%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.1%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.5% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.