Salt Lake Figure Skating

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
020715508
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Phone
8013622430
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Swimming & Other Water Recreation

Reported finances

Revenue
$82,733
Expenses
$78,519
Assets
$270,854
Liabilities
$7,277

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Stella Liu (Vice President)
  • Trina Ranin (President)

People named in this filing

  • Stella Liu (Vice President)
  • Trina Ranin (President)
  • Nara Aleksanyan (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To Provide children and parents organized framework for the activities surrounding the sport of amateur figure skating. The mission of Salt Lake Figure Skating is to inspire our members to achive their highest potential as skaters and supports of the figure skating community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Salt Lake Figure Skating Holds skating and other events in the community to increase awareness of the sport of amateur figure skating. These events also provide an economic benefit to the state of Utah from out-of-state visitors utilizing local hotels, restaurants and other local businesses.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.1%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.45; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.