Salt Lake City Bicycle Collective
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 810569811
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2010
- Location
- Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Phone
- 8013282453
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Job Training
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,880,519
- Expenses
- $1,531,011
- Assets
- $5,771,433
- Liabilities
- $1,096,891
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- DONNA MCALEER (EXECUTIVE DI): $111,729 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the salt lake city bicycle collective is to promote cycling as an effective and sustainable form of transportation and as a cornerstone of a cleaner, healthier, and safer society. The bicycle collective provides refurbished bicycles and educational programs to the community, focusing on children and lower income households.
What it reported doing in 2025
The bicycle collective promotes cycling as an effective and sustainable form of transportation and recreation, and as a cornerstone of a cleaner, healthier, and safer society. An overview of 2025: - received 4,011 bicycles through donation. - 1,222 bikes given away to the community through the bikes for goodwill program which is comprised of: - 440 goodwill bikes given away to kids. - 782 goodwill bikes given away to adults. - 276 volunteers donating 8,867 hours - 2,663 bikes parked (valet) - 102.5 tons of recycled material (98.7 tons of metal and 3.8 tons of rubber) bicycle collective's bikes for goodwill program provides free refurbished bicycles to individuals with great financial need so that they have a reliable form of transportation and mobility. Bicycles are donated to the shop, fixed by volunteers and staff, and given to people who are determined to have need by multiple community partners. Professional bicycle mechanics and trained volunteers refurbish nearly half of all donated bicycles making them available to individuals in need through our community partners and our bikes for goodwill program. Transportation is a formidable barrier to economic mobility. Access to nearly everything associated with economic progress and upward mobility - jobs, quality food, fairly-priced goods and services, healthcare, and school -- depends on the ability to get around efficiently and for an affordable price. Practical and affordable, a bike contributes to economic well-being, emotional stability, and physical health. It is a simple, eco- friendly transportation option. We work with more than 60 community partners across Utah who help us identify those who would benefit most from a free bike as part of our bikes-for-goodwill program. For others, we offer affordable used bikes and parts directly through our four community spaces and online.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73.5%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 88.6%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $16.19 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.6%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.77; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.3%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 24.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 73.5% of revenue deployed · 88.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $112K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.