Salt Lake Acting Company

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510196527
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2020
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Phone
8013630526
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Theater

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,769,905
Expenses
$2,015,748
Assets
$3,352,629
Liabilities
$339,286

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LISA KILLPACK (PRESIDENT)
  • MICHAELA BUCCOLA (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • CYNTHIA FLEMING (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • CYNTHIA FLEMING (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $115,092 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Salt lake acting company's mission is to engage and enrich community through brave, contemporary theatre.

What it reported doing in 2024

Salt lake acting company (slac) is a locally sourced, nationally recognized theatre serving salt lake county and the greater wasatch front. At slac, each play is an adventure. Since 1970, slac has been producing seasons of cutting-edge, thought-provoking, innovative productions that wouldn't be seen by Utah audiences if not for slac. We present a season of four to six world and regional premieres. Slac is a unique cornerstone of our artistic community and is an established home for artists and playwrights. Beyond the stage, we fulfill our mission to engage and enrich community through brave, contemporary theatre through our arts education and new play development programs, partnerships, and unsurpassed customer service.slac exists to serve our community. Our arts education, new play development, accessibility, and community outreach programs extend our reach far beyond the stage. We are an established artistic home for playwrights, and we give local artists a reason to stay in Utah. We partner with local community organizations alongside each play we produce, helping to further their missions and connecting them with our audience. Each december, we host over 2,000 title i students for vibrant musicals based on children's books, promoting literacy and showing them life's possibilities. We mentor students and early-career artists through the professional theatre program for emerging artists, provide free resources, rehearsal, and performance space to local organizations and artists, develop scripts and contribute to american theatre through the new play sounding series, and employ over 150 artists annually.salt lake acting company invites, embraces, and nurtures the identities and perspectives of those who aspire to belong to the theatre. We offer a suite of accessible performances during the run of each show, including asl interpretation and open captions, audio descriptions, and sensory-friendly performances for those with autism and other sensory sensitivities. We continually seek ways to remove barriers and become ever more accessible.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 99.4%; rating input score 99
  • Program expense ratio: 80.8%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.87 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -13.9%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.66; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.7%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 99.4% of revenue deployed · 80.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $115K · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 26/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.