Salish Sea Rotary Club of Mason County

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
883004405
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Union, WA, USA
Phone
3604908995
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,412
Expenses
$11,503
Assets
$10,358

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVE ARBAUGH (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • BRAD MILLER (President)

People named in this filing

  • DAVE ARBAUGH (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • NANCY BAYLEY (Treasurer)
  • LISA PERRY (MEMBER CHAIR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Salish sea rotary of mason county exists to steward personal and virtual collabortations that celebrate our community's natural resources, arts, culture and youth.

What it reported doing in 2024

Salish sea rotary of mason county exists to steward personal and virtual collabortations that celebrate our community's natural resources, arts, culture and youth. This year we celebrated oysterfest and fjordin crossin.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 3
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 3.3%; rating input score 3
  • Program expense ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 4

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 25.4%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -138.7% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 50.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 56.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 3.3% of revenue deployed · 4.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $505 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.