Salisbury Skatepark Committee Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263965649
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Salisbury, MD, USA
Phone
4108609683
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Parks and Playgrounds

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$0
Assets
$614
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Bobby Schaller (President)
  • A Scott Aaron (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Bobby Schaller (President)
  • A Scott Aaron (Vice President)
  • Andy Ball (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our main purpose is to provide and keep a free and public skate park for Salisbury, MD. In doing so, we build 'skatepark for the day' facilities for the public to use. Bringing a service to the community that is currently unmet. We charge a fee for the service thus fundraising towards the main purpose which is a permanent free and public skate park for Salisbury, MD. We continue to do the above although we have phase #1 and phase #2 of the park built. Now we also hold fundraisers for phase #3 at the skatepark as well as other fundraisers.

What it reported doing in 2020

Our main purpose is to provide and keep a free and public skate park for Salisbury, MD. In doing so, we build 'skatepark for the day' facilities for the public to use. Bringing a service to the community that is currently unmet. We charge a fee for the service thus fundraising towards the main purpose which is a permanent free and public skate park for Salisbury, MD. However in 2013 we did no fundraising to speak off as our efforts we're being blocked by the local government. The blockage stopped when the government changed over. Fundraising began again in 2014.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 55
  • Sustainability: 9
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -24.3% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -24.9% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2013 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Series filing activity did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.