Salinas Valley Aquatics

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942451852
IRS 990 coverage
2007–2007
Forms available
Form 990 2007
Location
Salinas, CA, USA
Phone
8664116228
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Swimming & Other Water Recreation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$140,249
Expenses
$275,884

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2007. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Matt Best (Board Member)
  • Davyd Morris (Board Member)
  • Martin Colijn (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2007. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Develop young swimmers

What it reported doing in 2007

Swimming Programs: Salinas Valley Aquatics teaches children and young adults water safety and life saving skills. SVA also teaches children to swim and provides them an opportunity to swim competitively. There were over 80 swimmers during the year. The club participated in more than 20 swim meets and sponsored/organized three meets. (82 swimmers)

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 24
  • Accountability: 0
  • Sustainability: NotEnoughData
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 66.7%; rating input score 67
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: Limited
  • Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Missing
    • Document-retention policy: Missing
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Missing
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Missing
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Missing

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 0 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $260K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 10 of 11 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: Conflict-of-interest policy not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Series revenue component sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.