Salina Soccer Club Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
481235309
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Salina, KS, USA
Phone
7858259582
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,229
Expenses
$41,513
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GREG MCMILLEN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MELISSA BIXBY (TREASURER)
  • CRAIG FISCHER (DIRECTOR)
  • KARLA MONTOY (VICE PRESIDE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide opportunities for high school and younger youth of the saline county area to participate in organized, competitive soccer: the ssc is commited to developing the "whole" child concept with emphasis on developing individual talent, fostering team spirit, requiring and demostrating sportmanship on and off the playing field and creating an environment for growth of the child into responsible citizenship. The ssc is also committed to working to provide quality soccer opportunities to all the youth of salina regardless of race, gender, creed, or income. This association is also commited to providing a safe environment for the youth participating by working with the coaches to improve their skills, ability and leadership necessary.

What it reported doing in 2017

Approximately 300 youth soccer players comprising 24 youth soccer teams in salina, ks and the saline county, ks area are served by the club in areas of leadership development, skill development, and team sportsmanship. The teams are served by approximately 14 head coaches and other volunteers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 67% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 95% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,762.4%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13.3% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $42K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2010 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.