Salesian Boys and Girls Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 941219139
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4153973068
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Boys Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,305,454
- Expenses
- $866,301
- Assets
- $38,040,590
- Liabilities
- $164,180
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOE BRAUCHER (PRESIDENT)
- SANDY GANDOLFO (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- AMY OVALLE (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
- RANDAL DEMARTINI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- JOE BRAUCHER (PRESIDENT)
- SANDY GANDOLFO (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- AMY OVALLE (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The salesian boys and girls club was organized to provide spiritual, educational, and athletic activities to young men and women.
What it reported doing in 2025
Allocation among the following activities are based on a percentage of persons served: 25% athletics - soccer, basketball, volleyball, baseball; 25% theatre; 25% tutorial program; 10% fine arts; 15% general program - table games (ping pong, pool), board games, pick-up games including kickball, volleyball, baseball and soccer.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 68% for direct work, and 32% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 86
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.4%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 59.6%; rating input score 60
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.43 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 33.6%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 43.91; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.4% of revenue deployed · 59.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 53 of 53 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $516K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.