Salem-keizer Education Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 930831467
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- Salem, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5039106901
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $117,026
- Expenses
- $361,261
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEFF AESCHLIMAN (PRESIDENT)
- KELLY CARLISLE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- KELLY CARLISLE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $105,989 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The salem keizer education foundation is a catalyst for enhancing the education of salem-keizer public school students by providing resources for creative and innovative programs and materials, educating and mobilizing the community, and sustaining collaborative partnerships that support its goals.
What it reported doing in 2020
Program activities ceased effective 6/12/20, and the organization began the dissolution process. The assets have been transferred to an organization with a similar purpose.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 98% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 30
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 3
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 27.4%; rating input score 27
- Program expense ratio: 22.2%; rating input score 22
- Fundraising efficiency: $43.31 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -208.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 29.3%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -10.7% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -12.5% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 27.4% of revenue deployed · 22.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $80K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $106K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2013 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 27/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.