Sakhi for South Asian Survivors Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133593806
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2127149153
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Human Rights
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,751,036
- Expenses
- $5,811,393
- Assets
- $7,412,038
- Liabilities
- $1,011,822
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KAVITA MEHRA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- KAVITA MEHRA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $206,105 total reported compensation
- MALINI KHORANA (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE & OPER): $139,890 total reported compensation
- POOJA RAJ-GREEN (DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMS): $121,522 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Sakhi for south asian survivors exists to represent the south asian and indo-caribbean diaspora in a survivor-led movement for gender justice and to honor the collective and inherent power of all survivors of violence.founded in 1989, sakhi was the first organization to break the silence surrounding gender-based violence within New York city's large south asian immigrant population.over the years, sakhi has worked to unify the movement for gender justice. In building justice and equity for survivors, sakhi actively invests in providing direct services, educating our community and building awareness that advocates for systems-change work.
What it reported doing in 2024
Mental health counseling program: gender-based violence is a public health issue that affects all communities. Gender, patriarchy, and culture interact in complex ways that influence physical and mental health. As a result of their experiences as immigrants and people of color, south asian and indo-caribbean survivors often suffer from unaddressed complex trauma. Additionally, in many communities, addressing mental health, like addressing gender-based violence, can attract stigma, rejection, and further isolation.sakhi has long been a part of the movement to open a dialogue around mental health, especially as it relates to gender-based violence. As trauma-responsive service providers, sakhi understands the importance of having mental health services be available to the community. Mental health services are neither affordable nor accessible for most u.s. Residents. Furthermore, those services that are available are rarely culturally- or linguistically-specific. Therefore, sakhi's mental health program offers: individual counseling: in sakhi's counseling program, evidence-based practices (ebp) are uniquely honed to include south asian and indo-caribbean perspectives. Counseling services include mental health assessments, individual one-on-one counseling sessions, and referrals/follow up with outside providers if possible.peer support groups: sakhi counselors and program advocates facilitate chai and chat support group sessions open both to clients moving out of one-on-one counseling and clients who prefer a group setting. Some examples of the topics raised by participants/clients in session can include: loss of identity, sexuality and consensual interactions, emotional regulation, internalized shame, psycho-education and redefining boundariesfamily counseling: through the ramesh and kalpana bhatia family foundation south asian safe families initiative, survivors were able to connect with our family mental health counseling program and explore the complex relationships between children, parents, partners, and chosen family in their healing. In many south asian and indo-caribbean households, where mental health is rarely discussed and often stigmatized, this program provides a novel path toward collective healing. Through culturally-grounded, trauma-informed care, families began to ebuild trust, create pathways towards healthy communication, and shift longstanding dynamics. For some, it marked the first time mental health was named not with shame, but with care. Navigating healing in holistic, transformative ways allows survivors to imagine new ways of living.sakhi started providing in-house mental health supportive counseling in 2017, and hired a full-time mental health counselor in 2019. With a dedicated and growing team of trauma-informed mental health service providers, sakhi currently provides mental health services in english, hindi, urdu, bengali, punjabi, and gujarati.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.6%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 75.8%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.55 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.28; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.1%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 23.8% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 21.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 26.3% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 76.6% of revenue deployed · 75.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 9 filed program accomplishments · $4.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $206K · 18 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.