Saints Youth Athletics Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 922508116
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Odenville, AL, USA
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Recreation& Sports N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $18,196
- Expenses
- $33,006
- Assets
- $12,014
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jesse Carter (President)
- Marah Johnson (1st Vice President)
- Adrian Davis (2nd Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Jesse Carter (President)
- Marah Johnson (1st Vice President)
- Adrian Davis (2nd Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
During the 2023 fiscal year Saints Youth Athletics Inc provided organized youth sports programs to approximately 300 children in the community. Our programs included football basketball softball cheerleading flag football and baseball focusing on skill development teamwork and sportsmanship. Through these activities we promoted physical fitness character building and community engagement giving children opportunities to participate in structured recreational and competitive sports in a safe and supportive environment.
What it reported doing in 2023
During 2023 the organization provided a youth basketball program serving approximately 120 participants. The program focused on teaching fundamentals teamwork and sportsmanship through practices and organized games offering youth a positive and structured environment to develop athletic and leadership skills.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 62% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 50
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.1%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 33.2%; rating input score 33
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -81.4%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.1% of revenue deployed · 33.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $11K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.