Saint Michael's Clinics Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 812927460
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Newark, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9736903514
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- AIDS
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,125,809
- Expenses
- $16,753,655
- Assets
- $17,045,024
- Liabilities
- $6,390,551
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALAN SICKLES MD (CEO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ALAN SICKLES MD (CEO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $476,312 total reported compensation
- SYED KAZMI (CMO AND SECRETARY): $444,897 total reported compensation
- RAJESH MEHTA (CFO AND TREASURER): $320,865 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the clinic is to provide comprehensive medical services, case management, psychological services, and substance-abuse counseling for people who are HIV positive or have AIDS. The clinic was transferred contracts from the united states department of health and human services, the New Jersey department of health and senior services and other resource providers to carry on the exempt function of the peter ho clinic which was a division of the st. Michael's medical center. The exempt purpose of the clinic is to promote health in the city of newark and surrounding areas through development, establishment, ownership and operation of outpatient or ambulatory care clinics in New Jersey, as provided for by n.j.a.c. Title 8, chapter 43a.
What it reported doing in 2024
Saint michael's clinics, inc. Provides comprehensive medical service, case management, psychological service, nutrition counseling and substance abuse counseling for people who are HIV positive or have AIDS. The exempt purpose of the saint michael's clinics, inc. Is to promote health in the city of newark and surrounding areas through development, establishment, ownership, and operations of outpatient clinics in New Jersey as provided for the New Jersey administrative code title 8, chapter 43a.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 44
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.2%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 96.3%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 20%; rating input score 20; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.2%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.02; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.37; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.2% of revenue deployed · 96.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $476K · 5 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $3M reported
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 20/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.