Saint Lukes Cancer Institute
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431933950
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012
- Location
- Kansas City, MO, USA
- Phone
- 8169322000
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Hospital, Specialty
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $19,822,646
- Expenses
- $17,566,411
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Saint luke's cancer institute is comitted to the highest levels of excellence in providing health services to all patients in a caring environment. We are dedicated to cancer patients. As a member of the saint luke's health system we are committed to enhancing the physical, mental and spiritual health of the communities we serve.
What it reported doing in 2012
Saint lukes cancer institute (slci) is a 9 bed specialty hospital and one of the largest non-profit providers in the region dedicated to providing comprehensive cancer services that include prevention, early detection, diagnosis, treatment, research, education and supportive care. In 2012 there were 862 patient days and 28,648 outpatient visits. The hospital participates in the medicaid and medicare programs and has charity care policies for assisting people without adequate means to pay for their caresaint lukes cancer institute offers inpatient oncology care with an emphasis on the care of gynecologic oncology and leukemia/lymphoma patients; outpatient infusion services that include: chemotherapy, photophersis, therapeutic plasma exchange, and blood management; radiation therapy; specialized high dose radiation therapy; prostate brachytherapy; one of the largest gynecologic oncology program in the region; medical oncology program with physicians specializing in breast, colon and lung cancers; cell processing lab; cord blood programs; genetic counseling; pet scanning; cancer screening; comprehensive breast center; behavioral health specialist offering support to patients and families at no cost; community outreach and education.we provide the only mobile mammography program in the Kansas city area, providing screening mammograms to uninsured and underinsured women in the Kansas city metropolitan area. Slci also invests in the future of health care through research activities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 63
- Accountability: 71
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 78.6%; rating input score 79; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.4%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.4%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -4.7% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -71% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 4 of 8 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $715K · 16 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2012
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 33 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.