Saint Louis Disc Golf Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 815054181
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Kirkwood, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3147952784
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parks and Playgrounds
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $185,137
- Expenses
- $182,435
- Assets
- $33,975
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- C J Novak (President)
- Robert Eich (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- C J Novak (President)
- Robert Eich (Vice President)
- Ray Vuichard (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the St Louis Disc Golf Club is to promote the sport of disc golf by providing a fun and competitive atmosphere for disc golf activities in the greater St Louis metropolitan area. We establish and maintain disc golf courses for the public benefit, working closely with the St Louis County Parks Department, the City of St Louis Department of Parks, Recreation and Forestry, and other municipal and regional entities as needed to continue and expand disc golf as a fun, healthy, low-cost recreational activity for people of all ages in our community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provide for the operation and maintenance of the existing disc golf courses in the St. Louis metropolitan area through hundreds of hours of volunteer labor provided by disc golf club members and supporters. These activities include trimming of vegetation, removal of fallen tree limbs, mulching around teepads, fairways and baskets, trash pickup, moving of disc golf baskets to new pin positions on the courses, and repairs to existing bridges, benches and walkways.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 97% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.5%; rating input score 99
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.5%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -17.8% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $182K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 41 of 41 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.