Saint John's Health Center Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 956100079
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Santa Monica, CA, US
- Phone
- 310.829.8424
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $47,578,032
- Expenses
- $53,764,488
- Assets
- $374,304,002
- Liabilities
- $16,781,712
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
130 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHERYL BOURGEOISPHD (PRESIDENT & CEO)
- ROBERT KLEIN (FORMER PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- SHERYL BOURGEOISPHD (PRESIDENT & CEO): $745,104 total reported compensation
- STELLA NICHOLS (CFO): $489,538 total reported compensation
- ANDY TRILLING (VP DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPAL & ESTATE GIFTS): $340,418 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support Providence Saint John's Health Center in its mission to provide compassionate, high-quality health care for all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.
What it reported doing in 2024
Affiliation endowment to support nonprofit tax-exempt charitable healthcare facilities and clinics, including, but not limited to, general acute care hospitals, in providing direct health care services and access thereto, including wellness programs, health research and health education to improve health to the residents in providence saint john's health center's service area (29 zip codes).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 95
- Accountability: 99
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.4%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 80.5%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.41 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 99.2%; rating input score 99; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.96; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.7%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 93.4% of revenue deployed · 80.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 121 of 122 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $43.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $745K · 130 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $1.1M reported
- Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 41 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 33 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.