Saint Barnabas Outpatient Centers
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222458479
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Oceanport, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9733224032
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $40,504,760
- Expenses
- $22,619,527
- Assets
- $262,713,389
- Liabilities
- $1,855,219
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GREGORY A ALBAN (ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- THOMAS A BIGA (TRUSTEE-RWJBH EVP,Pres NW Reg): $13,421,339 total reported compensation
- DAVID A MEBANE ESQ (TRUSTEE-RWJBH EVP/GEN COUNSEL): $1,933,127 total reported compensation
- GREGORY A ALBAN (ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT): $281,637 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide medically necessary outpatient services to the community through many different outpatient related programs for the benefit of the community, and in support of rwjbarnabas health; a tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system. The system provides medically necessary healthcare services to the community in a non-discriminatory manner regardless of an individual's race, color, creed, sex, national origin or ability to pay.
What it reported doing in 2024
Expenses incurred in providing medical necessary outpatient services to the community and in support of rwjbarnabas health; a tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system. Rwjbarnabas health provides healthcare services to the community in a non discriminatory manner regardless of an individual's race, color, creed, sex, national origin or ability to pay.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - Revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 57
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 87
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 50.3%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 90%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 44.2%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.61; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.9%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 50.3% of revenue deployed · 90% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 2 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $20.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $13.4M · 3 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $4.7M reported
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes foreign activity and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 111 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.