Saint Barnabas Behavioral Health Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222977312
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2018
Location
Toms River, NJ, USA
Phone
9733224032
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,676,072
Expenses
$9,966,159
Assets
$36,100,499
Liabilities
$12,169,539

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEANNA SPERLING (TRUSTEE-RWJBH BEH. HEALTH CEO)
  • SHARI H BEIRNE (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DEANNA SPERLING (TRUSTEE-RWJBH BEH. HEALTH CEO): $640,725 total reported compensation
  • JASON VIGLIAROLO (CFO/COO): $304,923 total reported compensation
  • RANDI HERSHKOWITZ RN (CHIEF NURSING OFFICER): $273,659 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Barnabas health behavioral health center's vision is to be a leading, comprehensive provider of quality behavioral healthcare services to the population of central and coastal New Jersey. To develop a regional outreach and referral system that will educate, promote and facilitate smooth access to our comprehensive services, and merge this continuum of services into a statewide behavioral healthcare system. Its mission is to be the leading regional provider of quality outcome behavioral healthcare services. These services will have value in their cost effectiveness for customers and offer a comprehensive continuum of service provided in an integrated healthcare delivery system. It's values: - dedication and commitment to providing individualized quality behavioral healthcare by practicing continuous quality improvement principles as well as conducting professional education and training. - a professional collaboration and communication with other clinical professionals, employees, manag

What it reported doing in 2018

Expenses incurred in providing medically necessary inpatient psychiatric services to all individuals in a non-discriminatory manner regardless of an individual's race, color, creed, sex, national origin or ability to pay. During 2018 the organization treated 1,406 patients for a total of 11,060 patient days. Please refer to schedule o for the organization's community benefit statement.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 62
  • Accountability: 87
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.8%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 90%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 77.8%; rating input score 78; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.4%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.62; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.6%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.3% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.8% of revenue deployed · 90% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $641K · 19 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $1.3M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes foreign activity, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 94 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.