St. Athanasius & St. Cyril Coptic Orthodox Theological School (ACTS)
Legal name: Saint Athanasius & Saint Cyril Coptic Orthodox Theological School
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330357356
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2018
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Pomona, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9098658378
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $834,519
- Expenses
- $653,684
- Assets
- $399,636
- Liabilities
- $4,527
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Bishop Kyrollos (Vice President)
- Bishop Serapion (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Bishop Kyrollos (Vice President): $28,254 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of Saint Athanasius and Saint Cyril Coptic Orthodox Theological School is to provide students with a quality Orthodox Christian distance education, which prepares them to become Christian leaders who are spiritually mature, biblically and theologically responsible, professionally competent, intellectually astute, deeply committed to sharing the truth of our Lord, God, and Savior, Jesus Christ, and fully equipped for the various ministries of His Church.
What it reported doing in 2018
Prepare the clergy, sunday school teachers, and others who serve in the capacity of ministerial work of the coptic orthodox church in north america. The theological school shall admit both orthodox and non-orthodox students with the degree of b.a. Or b.s. Or its equivalency in order to study for the degree of master of divinity or higher degree
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 75
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73.5%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 93.8%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.7%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.3%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 85.2% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 68.4% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 65.6% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 73.5% of revenue deployed · 93.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 4 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $613K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $28K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2016 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.